Eom, K., & †Ng, S. (2023). The potential of religion for promoting sustainability: The role of stewardship. Topics in Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12641

​

†Ng, S., & Eom, K. (2023). Religious stewardship and pro-environmental action: The mediating roles of environmental guilt and anger. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000499

​

†Leong, S., Eom, K., Ishii, K., Aichberger, M. C., Fetz, K., Müller, T. S., Kim, H. S., & Sherman, D. K. (2022). Individual costs and community benefits: Collectivism and individuals’ compliance with public health interventions. PLoS ONE, 17(11): e0275388. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275388

 

†Ramos, J., †Grant, M. D., †Flores, A., Dickert, S., Eom, K., Jiga-Boy, G., Kogut, T., Mayorga, M., Pedersen, E. J., Pereira, B., Rubaltelli, E., Sherman, D. K., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Van Boven, L. (2022). Structured analysis of personal criteria increases intentions to minimize others’ health risks during the COVID-19 pandemic. PANAS Nexus, pgac218. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac218

​

Kim, H. S., Eom, K., †Chuang, R. Y., & Sherman, D. K. (2022). Psychology and the threat of contagion: How perceived vulnerability to disease moderates the link between xenophobic thoughts and support for xenophobic actions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(10), 1465-1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211037138

​

Sherman, D. K., Updegraff, J. A., †Handy, M. S., Eom, K., & Kim, H. S. (2022). Beliefs and social norms as precursors of environmental support: The joint influence of collectivism and socioeconomic status. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(3), 463-477. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211007252   

​

†Huang, T., Leung, A. K.-y., Eom, K., & Tam, K. P. (2022). Important to me and my society: How culture influences the roles of personal values and perceived normative values in pro-environmental engagement via collectivistic orientation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 80, 101774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101774

​

*†Flores, A., *†Cole, J. C., Dickert, S., Eom, K., Jiga-Boy, G., Kogut, T., Loria, R., Mayorga, M., Pedersen, E. J., Pereira, B., Rubaltelli, E., Sherman, D. K., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Van Boven, L. (2022). Politicians polarize and experts depolarize public support for covid-19 management policies across countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(3), e2117543119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117543119

​

Eom, K., †Tok, T., Saad, C. S., & Kim, H. S. (2021). Religion, environmental guilt, and pro-environmental support: The opposing pathways of environmental stewardship and belief in a controlling god. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101717

​

†Chuang, R. Y., Eom, K., & Kim, H. S. (2021). Religion, social connectedness, and xenophobic responses to Ebola. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 678141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678141

​

†Choy, B. K., Eom, K., & Li, N. P. (2021). Too cynical to reconnect: Cynicism moderates the effect of social exclusion on prosociality through empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 178, 110871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110871     

​

Eom, K., Saad, C. S., & Kim, H. S. (2021). Religiosity moderates the link between environmental beliefs and pro-environmental support: The role of belief in a controlling god. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47, 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220948712    

​

*Lawrie, S., *Eom, K., Moza, D., Gabreliuc, A., & Kim, H. S. (2020). Cultural variability in the association between age and well-being: The role of uncertainty avoidance. Psychological Science, 31, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619887348   

​

Eom, K., †Papadakis, V., Sherman, D. K., & Kim, H. S. (2019). The psychology of pro-environmental support: In search of global solutions for a global problem. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 490–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419854099    

​

Kim, J., & Eom, K. (2019). Cross-cultural media effects research. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (4th ed.) (pp. 419-434). New York: Routledge.

​

Eom, K., Kim, H. S., & Sherman, D. K. (2018). Social class, control, and action: Socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.009      

​

Shin, J., Suh, E. M., Eom, K., & Kim, H. S. (2018). What does happiness prompt in your mind? Culture, word choice, and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9836-8

​

Eom, K., Kim, H. S., Sherman, D. K., & Ishii, K. (2016). Cultural variability in the link between environmental concern and support for environmental action. Psychological Science, 27(10), 1331–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616660078

​

Eom, K., & Kim, H. S. (2015). Intersubjective norms: Cultural and interpersonal perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(10), 1313–1316. [Commentary] https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115600262 

 

Eom, K., & Kim, H. S. (2015). Cultural psychological theory. In B. Gawronski, & G. V. Bodenhausen (Eds.), Theory and Explanation in Social Psychology (pp. 328–344). New York: Guilford Press.

 

De Leersnyder, J., Mesquita, B., Kim, H. S., Eom, K., & Choi, H. (2014). Emotional fit with culture: Predictor of individual differences in relational well-being. Emotion, 14(2), 241–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035296